Apr 02, 2007, 01:15 PM // 13:15
|
#21
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: EU
|
Some ppl are just dumb,thats why they cant read in all the places that there wont be any monthly fee.
Last edited by MirageMaster; Apr 02, 2007 at 04:57 PM // 16:57..
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 05:54 PM // 17:54
|
#22
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: Dragonestos
Profession: N/
|
Once ANET , if they ever do, adds more storage spots I think the first thing people will ask for is "More Storage"!! heheh. People can never get enough storage space and any increase in storage will only lead to people just wanting more. Kinda like drug addiction. When I get low on spots I just have to grin and bear it and take a trip to the merchant to get rid of what I can't sell. I have had to merchant lots of very nice Gold items that I simply could not use or sell in a timely manner. I don't think an increase in storage will solve that problem for me. The Solution to storage increase is just getting rid of some of your valubles or to purchase an extra char slot and make a mule.
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 06:09 PM // 18:09
|
#23
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: N/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothlorian Sassun
Once ANET , if they ever do, adds more storage spots I think the first thing people will ask for is "More Storage"!! heheh. People can never get enough storage space and any increase in storage will only lead to people just wanting more. Kinda like drug addiction. When I get low on spots I just have to grin and bear it and take a trip to the merchant to get rid of what I can't sell. I have had to merchant lots of very nice Gold items that I simply could not use or sell in a timely manner. I don't think an increase in storage will solve that problem for me. The Solution to storage increase is just getting rid of some of your valubles or to purchase an extra char slot and make a mule.
|
I was fine with the storage until the advent of Heroes (now i need stuff for them as well as my characters), advent of the new stuff for armor as well. Now it really isn't enough.
My issue with the mule is its not convenient, time and time again people have said they will pay for storage, why make me pay for a character slot, when I'm willing to pay the same $9.99 for additional/double storage?
So ... Anet, if you haven't figured it out yet, I'll pay for extra storage, and if you let me pay once for 2x storage and again for 3x storage you will make more money.
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 06:12 PM // 18:12
|
#24
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In Your Head
Guild: The Brave Will Fall [Nion]
Profession: Me/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophitia Leafblade
Ah uve clearly not read The "Why nuking Sucks" Thread, which tells u how superior Warriors are. They hardly ever get nerfed (with the exception of the team build IWAY) not that nerfing is the right term = Warriors get 'balanced', it seems its the other professions are the ones to get 'nerfed'. But ignoring that, sounds like theres some good things coming, nice work Anet.
|
That thread notes how little DPS Elementalists do towards targets compared to warriors. It does not note ANYwhere that warriors should be nerfed. If they do this one more time warriors and ele's combined would never be able to stop monks... anyway.
I hope these updates come soon, and actually are worthy. We have had too many horrible updates thus far.
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 08:08 PM // 20:08
|
#25
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Gwen Is [EVIL]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MirageMaster
Some ppl are just dumb,thats why they cant read in all the places that there wont be any monthly fee.
|
I think A-net just likes saying there will be no monthly fee. I'm almost willing to bet that Gaile whispers it in her sleep...
zzzzNo monthly feezzz snort sigh zzzzzzzz *big smile from happy dreams of feeless play*
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 08:12 PM // 20:12
|
#26
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Gwen Is [EVIL]
Profession: N/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shmanka
. If they do this one more time warriors and ele's combined would never be able to stop monks... anyway.
.
|
Shutting down monks is what necros and mesmers do bestest. Just another reason to think outside the "GLF TANKS AND NUKERS" mindset.
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 08:35 PM // 20:35
|
#27
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: R/
|
They should make Attunements give +2 energy instead of the new +1 they gave, and reduce the recharge on 5, 10 and 15 energy spells that cause damage, so that Elementalists can use the same spells more often and inevitably cause more damage!
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 08:47 PM // 20:47
|
#28
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jan 2007
Guild: Underworld Prodigies
Profession: E/Me
|
The only class that needs nerfing is assassin. They are way too powerful in areas like ab and pvp. It really is frustrating to see a warrior get destroyed in a second. No other class kills that fast.
Last edited by Two Dollar Hooker; Apr 02, 2007 at 08:58 PM // 20:58..
|
|
|
Apr 02, 2007, 09:07 PM // 21:07
|
#29
|
Hall Hero
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: California Canada/BC
Guild: STG Administrator
Profession: Mo/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretchman Drake
She hinted the Xunlai were active, meaning [hopefully] storage will finally be increased. It would only make sense since storage has been the same practically since launch and there are a minimum of 8 slots for characters assuming you have all 3 campaigns.
She also said a skill balance was coming this weekend. You know what that means... Warrior get nerfed... uh.. again! It's Anet's favorite tradition since '05
|
They won't nerf the Warrior or they will have to do the same to other melee classes.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM // 19:02.
|